There went out a sower to sow: And it came to pass, as he sowed, some fell by the way side, and the birds of the air came and devoured it up. And some fell on stony ground, where it had not much earth; and immediately it sprang up, because it had no depth of earth: But when the sun was up, it was scorched; and because it had no root, it withered away. And some fell among thorns, the thorns grew up, and choked it, and it yielded no fruit. And other fell on good ground, did yield fruit that sprang up and increased; and brought forth, some thirty, and some sixty, some an hundred. He said unto them, He that has ears to hear, let him hear.
And in this stained glass window the sower also had to contend with a nasty blue devil that was also trying to stop him.
Just like some so-called ‘Maverick Scientists’ and their theories. First there is opposition, vilification – defence of existing position – finally and if eventually accepted; and it can take a very long time: then, if, and when, along with acceptance..the new adopters often say… we knew that anyhow.
It looks like, if you care to look, to be interested, to be objective; that many theories are on the cusp of collapse in several fields of science.
Lets begin with: Electro-magnetism, the ‘Big Bang‘ and the theory of the Ether.
Professor Eric Laithwaite (Manchester University – Imperial College London). Described as an ‘Incredible Genius’ and ‘Maverick scientist’ I doubt that Eric would have thought of himself as a genius; he simple looked at nature and observed things and built simple experiments that anyone is capable of understanding if they use common sense and observation. Maverick is a description of him by mainline – toe the line scientists who are incapable of thinking out of the constraining box they inhabit, due to educational conditioning, peer pressure, and defending principles they have previously advocated (like parrots) to maintain common herd-like group think, and only such in-line thinkers are rewarded with research contracts these days.
Check-out a few of Eric’s demonstrations:
Gyroscopic primer – Large Gyroscope – YouTube List
People like Eric, a polymath, with diverse interests and an observational scientist of the natural world, are few and far between, but almost all human discoveries are made by free thinking radicals. Another that has found fame from the same university that Eric first worked at (Manchester) is Andre Geim the Russian who discovered Graphene.
Also initially a ‘maverick’ Andre became mainstream and accepted due to the amazing provable properties of his discoveries and one other important fact: no challenges came as he is unique in finding the properties of this new material, which was previously impossible! And importantly he was first so no accretions of further modifications have been added or argued about by subsequent scientific investigators. He used observation, not mathematics which might prove that such a material was impossible.
Andre simply used cello-tape and a pencil to prove his theory!
Science, in the field under discussion and based on physical experimentation and observation rather than mathematical presumption, is a practice that has almost died out.
Which brings us to Michael Faraday, a ‘maverick’ who had little education, and was self-taught by reading the books that he was binding as a publishers apprentice. He observed, experimented and found things out for himself. Regarded highly he rose up into the stratosphere of academic science. He postulated the theory of an Ether in between the magnet and the compass as the conductive substance that magnetism could travel within. However since that time much of his findings and principles of test, observe, experiment has been drowned out by mathematical theorists, that has resulted in a total lack of real understanding of electro-magnetism and the poo-pooing of a substance such as the Ether.
Accretion upon accretion of theoretical thinking and power structures have submerged basic understandings to a point where ‘everything is understood’ based upon theory that is forbidden to be challenged because it is so, so say the educationalists who learned or were dogmatised by previous generations of less free thinkers who pass on the straitjackets to new students: who only get degrees by towing the established lines.
What could we possible learn from going back to basics or alternative studies of electricity, magnetism, water, or heaven forbid ancient technology that mathematics have yet to fully submerge. Mathematics and theories that don’t look at electrical operations in comparison to a mathematical particle based Universe is a science refusing to be open minded. Ancient monolithic structures compared to geology or common sense observation of multiple ancient structures fly in the face of established prestigious pontiffs of archaeology and they cannot look to mathematics to disprove what is obvious to the common man. There is such a need in other areas of science.
Quantum physics and the standard theory of the beginnings of the Universe are just that; a theory and reputations like “that wheelchair guy” as Homer Simpson describes him: Stephan Hawkin hang on unproven quantum mechanics and wobbly mathematical atomic particle principles.
Most people don’t think about it, yet fully accept it! Its all gone unchallenged by the same means as the Hans Anderson story of the emperor’s new clothes; is amazing. Such folks as these ‘physicist’s’ should not even be classified as emperor’s at all. People who notice inconsistencies that challenge this status quo are ignored, side-lined or vilified.
German scientist Di Ing.K. Meyl thinks also that the Big Bang never occurred.
Pointing out that something held as a fixed concept to the holder of such belief often begets a furious angry response. Sometimes much worse:
At age 15 Eric Dollard was granted full access to RCA’s radio research headquarters. He is reputed to be the only scientist to fully investigate and recreate some aspects of the work of Nikola Tesla.
Working with Naval science project remnants he observed magnetic methods to create surface ship counter measures; invisibility to torpedo attack. Debuncked and disenfranchised, some people have recently helped Eric re-establish a workshop, although with some arguments between assisting parties. Eric has given several interesting talks on YouTube: History and Theory of Electricity. Here is an Index to his work.
The Big Bang and Black holes may not exist: Professor Laura Mersini-Houghton from the University of North Carolina
What’s that black part in that sun-spot?
Sun – powered by nuclear fusion – most likely a myth. Yes lots of thermo-nuclear and fusion activity… but a common man might observe that these swirling, fibrous, fiery actions are circling around and blowing upwards and into space emitting lots of heat, radiation, atoms etc – but what’s that black thing in the centre? “Oh just ignore that” the scientist says, “we will get answers to that some future time”, so no worries, go back to sleep… they say: “don’t worry about such things we are the ones to do that then tell you our results so you don’t need to think”. But this could upset a lot of people: No inner core in the sun.
To the ordinary bloke on the number 10 bus to Hackney, or the bar-room scientist in the local pub, even here they are harangued if they point out the obvious that the inside of the Sun appears to be dark and thus one can assume that the interior is colder than the outside… so demolishing the theory that the sun is a thermo-nuclear object, as without even hotter and brighter activity taking place in the core… many theories crumble.
Well some folks have noticed and are now seeking answers as this observation throws out lots of strongly held beliefs. Another operation with an entirely different scientific cosmology is required. Hmmm back to Faraday and Laithwaite and begin again from there!
See this and examine the evidence and the theory – lots of talks and videos here:
The Thunderbolts Project
Electric plasma discharge motifs found painted on ancient rocks by early mankind! These people could draw exact and beautiful real representations, so how come they drew this too! A message from ancient observations?
David Talbott & Walt Thornhill
These guys started off the theory of the Universe being held together by electro-magnetism, not gravity, and with it comes, if accepted the end of the Big Bang, quantum theory and its mechanics and lots of reputations.
The Big Bang the cosmological beginnings of the creation of the universe is built upon atomic theory of atoms.
Out goes the bang with a whimper…?
Should the alternative model of the universe as described in the Electric Universe if correct it then must mean that there was no big bang and in anycase simple observation of the movement of the galaxies does not look like the aftermath of a central single bang. At the very least these questions should be aired and discussed. They hold concepts and observations that an ordinary person with a little effort can indeed comprehend and make sense from it. Electricle activity seen in the heavens can be re-created in many fairly simple experiments right here on Earth without expensive accelerator complexes.
What caused the bang is not discussed, as every cause has an equal and we are told opposite reaction, well we get that, however the cosmos is not entirely behaving as those that hold on to the standard theory wish it to be fulfilled.
Of course an Electric Universe has the same questions as to the unknown origins, just as to what or who set of the bang in the first place!
The standard model is a model of physical reality by which anything else is compared too and if it does not fit it: is discarded as irrational!
You cannot challenge what the High Priests of Physics have ordained as the only truth. The model we have is so far stretched and less than understandable to the ordinary person: Wiki Standard Model.
Could Einstein be wrong? Hawking’s probably is as his own theory of the Big Bang contradicts his theory about black holes: these theories are mutually exclusive. See Hawking in the dark.
Einstein’s theory of relativity.
Some particles can be in two locations at the same time… and some electrical-magnetic phenomena appear to be instantaneous between two points. Such things bend the theory of light-speed being a maximum! Worse still: Gravity – may be only a localised phenomenon… according to the information gathered by the Electric Universe theory.
Silly question: If gravity exists under the conditions we are told then why does the space station orbiting the Earth held in place by gravity, yes, but yet the astronauts float within.. are they not subject to the gravity holding down the space station?
Einstein was not fully certain of his theories and seeked to work out a TOE a Theory Of Everything so as to bring everything within a single simple provable and demonstrable theory of how everything is encapsulated neatly. It became his life’s work: he failed. Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle snagged him. Probably his biggest stumbling block was the fact that the double slit experiment hung over him like a disturbing dark cloud as it showed that the observer of the experiment influenced its outcome. Could the observer, the human being be detached from the world within which they existed within? Such detachment is of course the scientific aim, but Mr Erwin Schrodinger buggered it up with his dead and alive cat. And the double slit experiment furthered the mystery. Wolfgang Pauli said: “Physics had got itself into a terrible muddle and he would greatly prefer to be working as a comedian”!
The Hubble telescope is finding oldest galaxies are producing more, new material, contrary to Big Bang assumptions; as the farthest must be the first to diminish!
Hawking and his radiations may just be a big windbag! And Brian Cox the darling of TV astronomy never answers these types of issues on the BBC SkyWatch programs. Controversy is never raised, because faced with evidence as outlined here and collectively you might almost imagine to see the fear of their world as experts crumbling… when you realise the implications of this:
Galaxy Z8-GND-5296 is one of the oldest so far to be observed and it throws up interesting information that confronts previously held concepts between Big Bang cosmology and telescopic empirical observations. According to the bang theory oldest galaxies will be losing steam and energy and light. Yet Z8-GND-5296 is one of the most active (generating over 300 new stars per year, and with more light than should be available). Our galaxy produces just a handful. Big Bangers no doubt say that the older and furthest out will have more power from the explosive force whilst ours is in a later aftermath zone. But as Z8-GND-5296 is half the known age of the Universe it should have stopped and be on the turn towards running down and stopping: entropy. Instead its speeding up and generating more! And because of their theory of gravity these big banger theorists require a hypothetical need for almost 70% of matter to be Dark and mysteriously un-observable and yet entirely necessary to account for and support the gravity theory which is all hypothetical but without which the gravity theory and probably the Big bang theory would fall-over.
This graphic is a recent pictorial representation of the Universe from the Max Plank institute (click to enlarge it). It shows uniformity and connectivity of the Galaxies, and their stars. Conformity that you might not expect from a chaotic big bang aftermath! Now to most ordinary folks this graphic showing the Universe; for all intents and purposes looks organised, self-replicating, structured and inter-connected; organic. Berkeland currents. But we are told by the experts that this is the result of a huge explosion. Personally all the explosions I have seen generate chaos.
Andromeda our nearest neighbour Galaxy: latest NASA Hubble picture – Amazing puts the vastness of the universe into a perspective of how miner we are in comparison, and this is just one galaxy, there are billions.
Alfred North Whitehead: proposed that the Universe is alive with continuous creation and that it was an organism – see his meta-physics. Observations show (photograph above from – Hawaii spectrometer; MOSFIRE) huge energy clouds and filaments emanating and connecting old and newer stars together ‘mother and daughter stars and galaxies’. This beautiful millennium simulation is from Volker Springel – Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics: the Map of the Universe.
Nature prefers common repeatable patterns.
Z8-GND-5296 shows: the Universe is ‘alive’ with continuous creation of galaxies and stars and thus very much like an organism! Continuous creation utilizing fields of electric plasma (Thunderbolts Project) make much more (and observable) sense to ordinary people over the experts who defend the theory of a single huge explosion. Of course both theories do not put forward a concept for what starting these things in the first place.
Here comes another irksome observational theory that many physicists don’t like because it doesn’t fit what they have been taught to believe. That electricity and magnetism must have a universal fluid within which their manifestations are able to take place and it was Michael Faraday who proposed it:
A universal substance pervading the universe and (Thunderbolts Project) emitted by all the Suns in the cosmos. Fanciful? Maybe but many scientific, some will say fringe science or suedo-science proponents think so. Tesla that towering almost forgotten real genius of electro-magnetism and electricity believed it to be the underlying force, that if captured would lead to uplifting society by providing a universal energy source.
Ether or Aether the Fifth Element know by the ancient civilisations which exists outside and within: Fire, Air, Earth, and Water. The element that the Alchemists sought to obtain, contain and manifest. Sir Isaac Newton spent most of his time seeking such an element: the Quintessence. The Quintessential life force; within, without and underlying all physical matter. Might it be electro-magnetic? The pulse of the planet beats at 10Hz the Schuman – Resonanz. Therefore all things on the planet must be associated; with more or lesser degrees too an (unconscious) synchronisation too this frequency @ 7.83Hz the human brain connects/synchronizes (Berger / Rutger Wever). The Casimir effect shows that in a void – a vacuum – empty space: two metal plates will move together; showing a force in nothingness!
Could electro-magnetism obtain some wavelength properties from this Ether coming from a counter or opposite location all about us unseen from the visible manifestations of physical matter; are we like the goldfish that cannot perceive of the medium of water and swims on without wondering.
Electricity is a hidden force, magnetism, and so too gravity: are there others? Many types of invisible forces have been described by various investigators all different names and descriptors of Faraday’s Ether? – a spacial conductive flux that is a channel that carries magnetism? A primordial atmosphere – unseen lines of force that act upon spiralling vortexes like water down the plughole and twisters, tornado’s and upon and surrounding magnetic fields: electro-magnetism.
The Odic Force that interested Baron Carl von Reichenbach
Prana – from India
Vril – which German occultists had beliefs in apparently including Hitler.
Qi – The Chinese belief in an invisible Earth current; the dragon force.
Telluric currents that flow near the supposed Ley-lines.
Counter-space (Rudolf Steiner): A theory that puts a source of energy, incoming from a counter balancing location juxtaposed to matter and the energies within all matter; a field that all matter: the entire Universe swims within.
Such beliefs may ad to the confusion, it’s a world-wide ancient indigenous belief in most cultures, it moves and flows depending upon external forces, conditions, objects, time of day etc. even the nearness of a person as demonstrated: a finger on the glass of a plasma globe.
An interesting book – Lost Science – about the early experimenters in odic forces, magnetism, electricity, early radio and Tesla technologies and others is by Gerry Vassilatos.
Of the Barron here is a extract quotation taken from the Sceptics Dictionary:
“He thought he had discovered a basic force in nature, which he called “od.” He is one of several classic examples of a respected scientist becoming fixated on an idea that only he can validate. The delusion in such men is impervious to criticism, which might lead one to conclude that a psychological aberration has occurred in a previously well-balanced and competent scientist.”
Step out of line of the common herd mind-set and you can expect a vicious attack: This above shows the mind-set; set against anything that does not conform to the common and accepted view of things, it’s an insult to a great man, who they acknowledge as a brilliant scientist, but with this single obsessive compulsion… what if he is right?
It’s the sort of thing said about many – proven later – to be correct experimenters, in all fields of discovery when during the course of traversing from one sacred belief mind-set crumbling when another is proved. The Barons Odic Force is just in the same mind-place as others, a possible theory yet to be proved just like Quantum Theory. When this is displaced by another such as the Electric universe, will history then insult Einstein? and that ‘Wheelchair guy’ and their compatriots in such a disgusting manner… lets hope not as these folks are only subject to their nature, upbringing and beliefs as much as any other common ordinary person. When we understand electricity; that will be a great day, just as much as the day it dawns on man that he and his mind and his thoughts are all governed by automated thinking.
Just as one religion wants to extinguish the others and claim total rights to truth and ‘their’ god because it is a business with good jobs for the priests, the comparison is right there in ‘holy science’. I wonder what such folks think about that apple bloke; Newton who is greatly respected but had a deeper hidden interest in Alchemy: they don’t appear to insult him half as much for this suspected lunacy.
In the end Einstein accepted the concept of an Ether, and this is not widely known.
Often experts in one area of expertise can be open minded about another area that they have not claimed authority over. A professional in one field may be flexible in another. Tell a geneticist about magnetism and they may show an interest, show a nuclear physicist strange things connected to octaves in the musical scale and so on. Minds can be closed and theories violently defended, when confronted. But they can be open – minded in other disciplines. When an artist loses their ‘muse’ or a writer gets a mental block, it can often be the result of saturation of the theme. Can such mental blockages be similar in fields of other types of study, just too much specialisation, causing mental inflexibility? I think so. Writers and artists know this and they often change circumstances, change direction for new inspiration. This is a need that all science should know about, cross-field experimentation, cross fertilisation. Great people are often Polymaths interested in almost everything.
As the Buddhist Koan goes: when the cup is full and the fresh tea is available the cup needs to be emptied before it can be filled.
Sceptics of all persuasions want to asses new concepts within the / their established paradigm, anything outside is classified as ‘wacky science’. When a mind-set is set in such a manner it is set against anything that could change such a ‘world view’.
I’ll get off my pulpit and go next to upset more of such folks with:
Quantum theory does it ad up? Even Richard Feynman reputedly said that it was incomprehensible to fully understand, also that we don’t know what energy is.
Quantum Mechanics is concerned with particle theories at the minuscule levels of sub atomic activity: how they behave at unseen levels and need mathematics and certain mental gyrations to grasp the theory as it applies at these sub-microscopic levels. However certain demonstrable actions cause ramifications beyond this fundamental world of the building blocks of the material world we live within. Experimenters and theorists say that things at this level can have no reality in our Macro-world, but they could easily be wrong.
Double slit experiment
Double Slit: is it a wave is it a particle? Don’t look now because it might become what it should not be according to the experts prediction.
Is light a waveform or an atomic photon particle, an experiment originally done over a hundred years ago shows that the results depend upon how the information is collected. Potentially both realities of the results are simultaneously possible – Erwin Schrodinger: it’s a probability that is not fixed in the experiment itself until the results – data is collected and noted, i.e. the observer creates the result from two options: see this video.
A subatomic particle can effect another over vast distance, two can be in the same state and respond to each other, at exactly the same time.
Is reality an entanglement involved with consciousness? This has been ignored by physicists because to accept it changes all their models and would mean stepping out of line resulting in peer group ridicule, it’s a risky business to point out a truth. So physicists ignore it and build fabricated hypothesis on shaky ground. The defence against any thinking about what this experiment means is to almost ignore it, because it predicts that reality is flexible; so they say it is confined to the sub-microscopic atomic elements level only!
Here comes more irritation for physicist:
My Big Toe – A Theory of Everything
Tom Campbell; Believes that the Double Slit – experiment proves that it does indeed have ramifications for the world we see around us and not simply at the micro scale. It is the basis of his Theory Of Everything.
To accept that a probability is fixed only when observed has huge ramifications. Most theorists state that it only applies to the minute sub atomic quantum level to dodge the issue and move on. But surly this is a mistake, rather like that old adage ‘as above so below’ the microcosm is a reflection of the macrocosm. Such folks have other theories which they say only apply out there in the cosmos; the need for dark matter, gravity bending light amongst others, that don’t apply locally. Such physically unprovable theories are built upon mathematical assumption. The simple double slit experiment shows the conundrum that these folks want to ignore because if it is accepted then Pandora’s box is opened and anything could happen. As consciousness and the evolution of it would have to become a factor of study to turn too!
Are such things noticeable in everyday life, one possible example that we all experience are: Coincidences could be a possible observable example of this theory in action; when you notice – observe coincidences: are they generated by your own subconscious interest or attraction?
Tom Campbell uses the double slit experiment and takes on its ramifications into many strange lands and thus is ostracised by mainstream science for his efforts.
Comments on the YouTube video: “This man should be shot for blasphemy against logic”.
“More nonsense interpretations of experimental quantum mechanics”. “wow.. double slit experiment turned into scientific fairy tale”.
Which are good quotations fully expected by the next experimenter and his amazing stories of adversity when trying to show alternatives to standard accepted methods. Its easy to put down new interpretations and new ideas, as history shows that anyone with a new idea faces the objectionists who will denie anything that the herd already accepts as truth, they never question their own mental-set and are obstacles to change. Until Copernicus showed through his telescope that the celestial orbs in the sky were not perfect in every manner (as the church pronounced) and Galileo supported and proved the contrary and was sent to prison for it.
What is consciousness? If it can influence physical reality…it ought to be studied…
Returning to Eric Dollard his talk on the History and Theory of Electricity shows that we do not understand electricity.
Tesla apart from inventing alternating current and lots of essential apparatus used today, apparently he obtained energy from the huge reservoir of electro-magnetic energy within the earth and its magnetic field. His radio system was transmitted through the earth from a signal broadcaster that was earthed with a long metal pole inserted deep into the ground, with an antenna-receiver of atmospheric energies from the Ether (Sun) in his Wardenclyffe tower.
Tapping into and signal transmitting along Telluric vibrations… radio can be received by a suitable iron bar hammered into the ground as an aerial, connected to a receiver.
Mr Dollard – tells a nice story about being different: don’t frown and then goes on to give a lengthy talk about these electrical subjects. Does electricity flow in a magnetic field surrounding the wire and not within the wire itself?
Earth is a huge motor revolving in space rushing around the galactic center; this momentum is huge and must be generating a form of energy and so its back to Laithwaite and spinning gyroscopes. He invented the Maglev train and of course it never was taken up in great Britain! Japan and China and other countries have and are currently doing so.
This guy got ostracised and any re-establishment of education and more trials and tests related to these things just stopped – Obituary. People don’t realise that the Earth is spining around on its axis at 1000mph whilst also spinning around the Sun which in turn is spinning rapidly around the Galaxy and so on: massive forces of momentum. All of this force of momentum, even without considering particles blasting at us from the Sun or our Earth swimming in a sea of Odic Ether, must be producing huge amounts of power to tap just from the centrifugal force of movement alone. NASA uses these planetary forces to sling -shot space vehicles to faster speeds, they say by – gravity – could momentum also be involved?
New Film documentary THE PRINCIPLE looks like causing a stir in these fields!
However it looks Geocentrically biased and Kate don’t like it.
And there’s more – much more:
The post about Artificial Intelligence and thinking machines throws up thoughts about human conciousness itself. Also in the received comments there is a response linking to emerging work advancing a theory of intelligence being within electro magnetic field within the brain the real seat of conciousness?
Other areas where discoveries are being found, or denounced are:
Water – DNA – Genetics – Evolution – Darwinism – Ancient Engineering – Egyptology – The Brain – Conciousness – Electronic Medicine, Placebo, A.I. And Thinking Machines
And much more.
A recommended Magazine covering such subjects – Science in Society magazine.